Jan. 25, 2009


Here we are, tourists on a winter morning on Duke of Gloucester Street, tugging on stout ropes that snake through block-and-tackle rigs, lifting a 1300-pound roof beam – up a little, stop, down a little, hold it – lining it up to match grooves in the beam with waiting upright members, and finally easing it into place.

Hauling on ropes that feel like tallship halyards, We the People play a small part – along with dozens of skilled carpenters, brick and shingle makers, archaeologists and historians – in the early stages of the first major reconstruction on the main street in Williamsburg in half a century: Charlton’s Coffee House.

Flash back to 1765. The Stamp Act, imposing taxes on everything from commercial papers to playing cards, had been passed by Parliament and stamp distributors were arriving in the colonies. One of them, poor George Mercer, found himself running down DOG Street with angry residents at his heels.

Fortunately for Mercer, Francis Fauquier, who was then sitting on Charlton’s front porch with members of his council, hauled the terrified tax man into the coffeehouse, then stood off the threatening, buzzing crowd for what appears to have been hours.

The Crowd did not yet disperse [Fauquier wrote], it was growing dark and I did not think it safe to leave Mr. Mercer behind me, so I advanced to the Edge of the Steps, and said aloud I believed no man there would do me any hurt, and turned to Mr. Mercer and told him if he would walk with me through the people I believed I could conduct him safe to my house, and we accordingly walked side by side through the thickest of the people who did not molest us; tho’ there was some little murmurs.

So Fauquier – who would dissolve the House of Burgesses when it passed a resolution against the Tax Act – saved the poor bureaucrat’s bacon at this very place where spirited discussions accompanied tea, coffee and hot chocolate.

“Coffeehouses were centers of news and commerce in the eighteenth-century British world,” writes Edward Chappell, director of archaeological research at the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. “Hot caffeinated drinks fueled intellectual discourse and spirited gossip, as well as providing a stimulant to political debate and business engagement.”

The single-story-and-a-half wood frame building over a brick cellar began as a storehouse around 1750. It had a porch running along the front facing Duke of Gloucester Street. Richard Charlton, an enterprising wigmaker, bought it and, realizing its location would appeal to politicians and others with business at the Capitol, converted it to a coffeehouse, then to a tavern. It was demolished to make way for a residence, but the lot had been vacant for more than a decade.

The idea for recreating the coffeehouse has been a dream of Williamsburg officials since they discovered the original foundations, bricks from the central fireplace, lead window fragments and other archaeological treasures several years ago. The dream became reality with a recent $5 million grant from Forrest and Deborah Mars of Big Horn, Wyo. He’s grandson to the founder of Mars, the candy company.

The project has been carried out by historic trades carpenters with the help of civil engineering students from the Virginia Military Institute and members of the Timber Framers Guild.

And me.

Well, actually 60 or more of us who showed up on Dec. 20. With the help of authentic-looking triangular block-and-tackle rigs and long ropes stretching into the street, we raised the timber-framed south wall and then the second floor roof beam.

The only thing lacking on that bitter cold morning was coffee. But Shield’s Tavern across the street – it was also a coffeehouse at one time – answered that need, along with a historically accurate pastry. From there, through leaded glass windows, one could imagine all that stirring, caffeinated history.

Framework of coffeehouse and cartoon of spirited coffeehouse quarrel in old England. Courtesy of Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.

Jan. 18, 2009


If ever there were closer friends, Mike Prince, once a captain in the Norfolk Police Department, and Charley Cannon, a prominent politician and saloonkeeper, they’d be hard to find. But Prince, apparently in a jealous rage, gunned down Cannon in broad daylight in downtown Norfolk on Aug. 3, 1900.

I’ve devoted a lot of space to that event in recent weeks, primarily because it caused one of the most sensational trials ever held in the city, and the trial took place in a grand new federal building that is reopening, 108 years later, as the downtown Public Library.

In the telling, a number of Cannon and Prince descendants – there are many here – have offered insights into the lives of their not-so-distant relatives. After more than a century, time seems to have healed most, but not all, of the hurt caused by the tragedy.

One might assume that, with infidelity tainting their marriage, the Princes would have parted company. His children had been staying with his brother while he waited in prison for the trial. His wife “is said to be residing with her father,” this newspaper said. A clear separation? But William T. Prince, a U.S magistrate judge in Norfolk, contacted me.

“It appears,” he wrote in an e-mail, “that Mike and Capitola, his wife, did not divorce. In fact, their daughter Lillian was born in 1904. Cappy died in 1933, Mike in 1934. They are buried side by side in St. Mary’s Cemetery directly across a small lane from the graves of my parents. At Cappy's death she was identified as the wife of Michael; and at his death he was identified as the widower of Capitola.

“The Norfolk City Directory of 1910 lists ‘J.E. Prince & Co.’ as a wholesale wines and liquors distributor located at 102-104 Commercial Place. The principals of the company were James E. and Michael H. Prince and Robert L. Boggs.”

Judge Prince’s daughter, Sarah Pishko, is the owner of Prince Books, the downtown bookstore that adjoins TowneBank building. Between that building, originally Citizens Bank, and the U. S. Customs House is a parking lot where the fatal shots were fired. On the wall near the counter of the Prince Books cafĂ© is an enlarged flier of the wine and liquor business. The cheapest items on the list were brands of rye and gin for $1.25 per gallon.

John Cannon of Chesapeake, a great grandnephew of Charles, has done extensive research on the family and found that Charles’ father, an Irish immigrant, had joined the Confederate Army in April 1862 only to desert a month later. Nevertheless, Charles became a successful businessman. He rented river bottomland in the Elizabeth River where he dredged for oysters and owned a saloon on Plume Street.

One of the striking things about Cannon’s death was the testimony that he had been having an affair with Prince’s wife, but the trial also revealed that she had gone to Cannon out of desperation because Prince wasn’t bringing home enough money to support his growing family of seven children. “Mike was not a very good provider,” says the present-day Cannon. “Capitola went to Charley’s saloon to get money.”

Was the outrage sparked by embarrassment that his wife was pleading for money to support her children, not a love affair?

John Cannon’s cousin, Cheryl Cannon Hummer, also of Chesapeake, wrote that the two had talked about the tragedy many times “and have a hard time believing it was a crime of passion. It all sounded rather cold-blooded to us.”

That being said, there might have been something of a wild streak in Cannon that was passed down from his father, who frequently showed up in court records of the time, she says. And then there was Prince. John Cannon found that Prince remained on the Police force long enough to be involved in an incident at a rooming house where a derelict was threatening others with a rifle. “Police stormed the place and Mike shot him. It appears he was quick on the trigger.”

Cheryl Hummer says the obituary notice and description of the funeral service were “heart wrenching.” Charles' parents were married at St. Mary's Catholic Church and now the same church was needed for their first son’s funeral service. “A very sad story all around,” she feels.

Near the entrance to St. Mary’s Catholic Cemetery on Church Street – not far from Prince’s grave – is a brown marble obelisk making the graves of the Cannon family. Prominently etched in the marble is the inscription, “My Beloved Son/Charles J. Cannon/Aug. 6, 1860 - Aug. 3 1900.”

Annie Cannon, Charley’s widow, ran his saloon successfully for many years after his death, then moved to Washington, D.C. She was not buried in the Cannon plot.

Family fascination with the Prince-Cannon matter has led to research in the genealogical records at Norfolk Public Library’s Sargeant Memorial Room – now in the library’s new home in the old courthouse building. Robert B. Hitchings, the head of SMR who alerted me to this fascinating story, recalls that descendants of the two men recently expressed an interest in coming in for further study.

A grin works its way around the corners of Hitchings’ mouth. “I told them they’re welcome, but please leave their weapons at the door.”


Sketch of Charles Cannon from The Norfolk Dispatch, Dec. 12, 1900, and Michael Prince from The Norfolk Dispatch Dec. 15.

Jan. 11, 2009


If ever it could be said that a hush fell over a courtroom, the one that descended on the grand marble chamber in the federal building on Plume Street must have been total as Police Captain Michael H. Prince rose to face the jury. And if anyone could be said to look pale as a ghost, it was he.

On Aug. 3, 1900, Prince had pulled out his service revolver and killed his lifelong friend, Charles Cannon, in broad daylight in downtown Norfolk.

The trial, the first important matter in that courtroom, was one of the most sensational in the city’s history – and might still hold that distinction today. It was, after all, not simply a case of cold-blooded murder, as the prosecution charged, but something rather, shall we say, shocking?

As the staff of the Norfolk Public Library continues arranging books on the non-fiction shelves in the building on Plume Street that was once the courthouse, they might pause to remember that history – especially in this famously wicked city – is often stranger than fiction.

Testimony during the weeklong trial revealed that Prince had learned that his wife may have been intimate with Cannon. Cannon’s angry wife had written to “Mike,” suggesting he stake out Cannon’s Plume Street saloon for proof of a liaison. It’s not clear he ever caught them together, but Prince testified that his wife confessed to him.

He didn’t plan to kill Cannon, he claimed, but when he confronted him on Main Street and pulled him into the area between the Customs House and Citizens’ Bank, his one-time friend admitted the affair. What really set him off, though, was Cannon’s claim that he wasn’t her only lover.

“Put yourself in this man’s place,” suggested R. R. Thorpe, a defense attorney who may have set an all-time record for what reporters used to call peroration. “See him drenched in the gall and wormwood of a tribulation the depth of which no mortal can fathom….Distracted between contending emotions: wishing to save his children the terrible disgrace, he meets…the corrupter of his wife, the violator of his bed. He meets this slimy reprobate, the hypocrite friend, when his brain was on fire and every fiend of hell was let loose upon his heart. What could he do? But one course was open to him. Kill himself or kill the vile author of his ruin.”

Among the Ten Commandment’s “thou shalts,” is one about killing, Thorpe points out, but there are two other prohibitions that apply, coveting a neighbor’s wife and committing adultery.

“Michael H. Prince did what was right. He did what a sane man should have done and what an insane man could not have helped doing. Put that down, Mr. District Attorney, as my opinion. God put him in that frame of mind and made him do as he did.”

The D. A., Edgar Allan, sought to sow doubt in the jurors’ minds, pointing to a note that Mrs. Prince had sent to Cannon, pleading for money to help feed her children. “I don’t know where Prince spent his money,” he said. “There are no witnesses to show he cared a thing for his wife. There is no evidence to show a happy home was destroyed.

“They say he was wild when he shot. Every shot struck its mark. Think of it! A wild man, a crazy man, who fires five shots and the ground doesn’t get a bullet unless it went through the body. He shot with such unerring aim that every bullet struck its victim…[then] this sick man walked deliberately back, took aim, stooped a little and fired and the blood oozed from the head, stopped the heartbeat and impulse and stopped Cannon’s last prayer, ‘God me merciful to me, a sinner.’ ”

The killing of Cannon was clearly carried out with malice aforethought, Allan concluded. “I have done my duty as best I could, gentlemen of the jury, will you do yours?”

Knowing that he faced death on the gallows, Prince trembled as he rose and faced the jury. “Gentlemen,” said the clerk of court, “look upon the prisoner and say be he guilty or not guilty.”

“Not guilty,” the foreman said.

The spectators, many of whom apparently sided with Prince, burst into applause and cheering. After much shaking of hands, Prince walked from the court a free man, stopping first at his brother’s cigar store, then taking a carriage to his mother’s house on Granby Street.

And then vanishing. At least from the public’s eye. But descendants of both killer and victim have recently crossed paths and begun piecing the story together.

Next week: Epilogue.
Illustration: Postcard, ca 1900, shows Customs House (with columns) and, beside it next to trolley, the Citizens' Bank. Courtesy of TowneBank.

Jan. 4, 2009


TRAGEDY IN THE
HEART OF CITY

Charles J. Cannon Shot Down by
Police Captain Prince

SAYS HE WAS JUSTIFIED

Those were the headlines that newspaper readers saw on the morning paper of Aug. 4, 1900. They must have gasped as the type jumped off the page, then read the details with fascination bordering on disbelief.

In an alleyway between the Customs House and Citizens Bank on Main Street, Captain Michael H. Prince had confronted Charley Cannon, his lifelong friend. The two stood with one arm on the other’s shoulder. Prince had been best man in Cannon’s wedding. Cannon godfather to one of Prince’s children. Their conversation was brief and soon turned angry. And suddenly Prince pulled a gun from his jacket pocket and shot Cannon several times. Then, as Cannon lay in agony on the ground, Prince walked up to him, leaned over and shot him in the head.

Prince surrendered his pistol to a nearby police officer and walked to the station house where he told his boss, the chief of police, “I am your prisoner. I shot Charley Cannon.”

The slaying of Cannon, an oyster inspector and saloonkeeper, was witnessed by dozens of people in broad daylight. The preliminary hearing on Aug. 4 – the same day as Cannon’s funeral at St. Mary’s Catholic Church – was held right next to the scene of the murder, the Customs House. But the trial – it was a federal case because the assault took place on U.S. property – was to be the first major criminal case heard in the marble-clad courtroom in the new federal building on Plume Street. The building takes on a new life in the coming weeks as home of the Norfolk Public Library’s downtown branch.

It was one of the most sensational murder trials ever witnessed in the city, conducted by some of the most prominent prosecutors and attorneys in the region. Fascinated citizens packed the courtroom, hanging on every word, gasping at each new revelation as witnesses, and Prince himself, took the stand.

At the arraignment on December 10, Prince, 42, stood with downcast eyes, shifting his weight. Several times he sighed deeply, but when asked how he responded to the charges, his voice was firm. “Not guilty.”

The trial took place before Judge Edmund Waddill. Edgar Allen, a bulldog of a district attorney from Richmond, served as prosecutor. Prince was represented by local attorneys R. R. Thorpe and T.H. Willcox. The latter was a former judge and founding partner in what became one of Norfolk’s largest law firms, Willcox & Savage.

The prosecution put numerous witnesses on the stand. They established beyond doubt that Prince shot Cannon. But whether he did it coolly and deliberately or in a moment of temporary madness would be for the jury to decide. The first witness to cause a stir in the courtroom was Cannon's widow, Annie. She appeared to be in deep mourning, with a long black veil pushed back from her sad face. “I have five helpless children,” she said.

But her appearance provided an opening for the defense. Willcox showed her an anonymous note and, after first denying it, she confessed she had written it to Prince.

“Mike, I don’t like to have anything to do with a man and wife, but I think it a dam shame the way that your wife is treating you.” She suggested that he “make it your business” to go to Plume Street at night “and watch her going down there to meet a married man...and when you see her with this man you beat her like hell.”

Who was the married man? When the defense put on its case, it quickly became clear that it was Prince’s old friend, Charley Cannon.

When Prince took the stand, he was pale and his voice shaky, On Aug, 1, he said, he noticed his wife was trying to conceal a letter and grabbed it from her. It was to Cannon. “C. Send me $10. I am in more trouble than I ever was in my life. I will tell you all when I see you.”

Prince testified that Cannon’s wife told him, “Your wife and my Charley are being intimate.” When he confronted her, he said, she confessed to the affair. He saw his old friend downtown and asked if it were true, and “I told him I had received letters and positive information that he had been going with my wife. He said, in a sort of sneering manner, “I am not the only man.”

Prince claimed he had no intention of killing Cannon, but that comment enraged him and he reached for his pistol. He had not, he said, taken any action for his children’s sake. And at that point, he slumped forward, his face in his hands, and wept. Finally, he was able to say, “I struggled hard to save my children this terrible disgrace.”

After six days of trial, the prosecution and defense rested their cases.


Next week: The case goes to the jury.

Sketch of Michael H. Prince from The Norfolk Dispatch, Dec. 15, 1900